Sunday, April 3, 2011

The Myth of Persephone, Darkly Reimagined (Abandon Review)

CHECK OUT our Meg Cabot Book Giveaway!

Sandy



Hey Guys! Please give a warm welcome to our guest blogger, Sandy, who has written a fabulous review on Meg Cabot's Abandon.

A few days ago Alyssa posted her Abandon review, and we thought it would be interesting to offer another perspective. We know Abandon isn't released until April, but if you have read an ARC...what do you think? Do you agree with Sandy? Or Alyssa? Or both? :) Make sure to share your thoughts with us! :)  -Rane-


The Myth of Persephone, Darkly Reimagined

Title: Abandon (Book One)
Author: Meg Cabot
Publisher: Scholastic Inc.
Release Date: April 26, 2011
Hardcover: 320 pages
Source: ARC (Thanks, Scholastic!)


She knows what it's like to die. Now Death wants her back. Seventeen-year-old Pierce knows what happens to us when we die. That's how she met John Hayden, the mysterious stranger who's made returning to normal life—or at least life as Pierce knew it before the accident—next to impossible. Though she thought she escaped him—starting a new school in a whole new place—it turns out she was wrong. He finds her. What does John want from her? Pierce thinks she knows... just like she knows he's no guardian angel, and his dark world isn't exactly heaven. But she can't stay away from him, either, especially since he's always there when she least expects it, but exactly when she needs him most. But if she lets herself fall any further, she might find herself back in the place she fears the most. And when Pierce discovers the shocking truth, that’s exactly where John sweeps her: The Underworld.

Review:

I have to say that I am a bit disappointed in this book. I was so excited when the ARC showed up on my doorstep, and I ripped open the package to find the sleek, black-and-gold book. As a child, I loved the romance and dark dangers lurking in ancient Greek myths. I was especially intrigued by the myth of Persephone and the lord of the underworld. Needless to say, I had very high hopes for this book.

I felt that the characters could use a bit more development, and they probably will be later in the series. Perhaps I am overly critical, but recently I have found that many female protagonists in YA novels tend to annoy me. Bella particularly irked me in the Twilight series, and I only put up with her because I loved Edward and Jacob. Bella just seemed so helpless, useless, and clueless—especially when it came to reading both Edward's and Jacob's feelings. Pierce Oliviera is a similarly frustrating character. She fully intends to be a strong and independent girl, but somehow often manages to come off as a bit dense and rash. John (a.k.a. Death or the ruler of the underworld) describes her as caring and selfless, but I wasn’t entirely convinced by her desire to help others. She simply had no idea what the people she cared about wanted or needed. I often had the urge to shake her and ask her if she really was that blind. 

John, while only slightly less clueless than Pierce, displayed a bit more depth. I mean, you can’t exactly blame a guy who has so little interaction with live people for not understanding a girl—especially a girl like Pierce. Sometimes I had imagined Hades as a seductive bad boy, and other times, I believed him to be a manipulative and selfish sort who could only get the girl by tricking her into eating the food from his world. Cabot created a somewhat complex and very sympathetic modern-day Hades figure in John. He exuded just the right amount of moody, dark, bad boy sex appeal, and I genuinely felt bad for him. He really didn't deserve a thankless job for eternity. And he certainly didn’t deserve a girlfriend who had no sense of emotional accountability. I am curious to learn more about his history as the series develops.

I would like to point out that one of Cabot's greatest strengths is her ability to make her main character jump off the page. As a writer, I know that it is very difficult to express a unique point of view, rather than simply write in an expository manner. In Abandon, Pierce's attitude and opinions infuse every line of text, and I really felt as though I was experiencing the story through her eyes. It's simply too bad for me that I didn't agree with most of her thoughts and actions.

The story opens about a year and a half after Pierce's near-death experience, and bounces back and forth in time between the present and past, filling in bits and pieces of information. This was a very clever plot device to keep the reader curious about Pierce's encounter with John in the underworld and the violent events afterwards that forced her to change schools and move to her mother's hometown on a tiny island off the coast of Florida. Overall, I found myself wanting to know the back story because it was offered so piecemeal, and this is what kept me turning the pages, despite my frustrations. However, the more I found out about her actions, the less sympathetic I became to Pierce. Eventually, I finished the book because I really wanted a resolution or some sort of reward for sticking it out, but I encountered a total cliffhanger. I prefer series that provide the reader with some payoff at the end of each book, while still keeping you hungry for more. I suppose it’s a very fine balance that is difficult to achieve. 

So I am moderately interested in finding out what will happen next, but I haven’t quite decided whether I will read the next book in the series. Perhaps Pierce will mature and become a less frustrating character in the next installment. If I didn’t have such a strong reaction to Pierce, I believe it would have been a much more enjoyable reading experience for me. The concept is really interesting, and I’d kind of like to see how Cabot develops her version of the myth.

My rating: 2.75


Comments (9)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Sandy, you have expressed your thoughts so well in this review! I really get where you are coming from. Weak female protagonists really annoy me, too. I'm not saying we have to go to the other extreme and create female characters without a soft side. I still might be interested in reading this when it comes out just to decide for myself:) I can see how giving bits and bits of history--keeping the reader in suspense--can hook a reader. That's actually what I've tried to do with my own novel. You'll have to let me know how it's working out hehe. You raise a really good point, though. There might be a lot more development coming in the next.

GREAT POST, SANDY!!
1 reply · active 730 weeks ago
Thanks, Rane! :) And thanks for giving me the opportunity to post on your blog. I hope no one misunderstood what I was trying to say about Pierce. She's not really weak and helpless. She's actually got quite a strong will. I just found her to be too stubborn at times and a little too blind to other's feelings. I think you should check out the book for yourself. There were some great parts that kept me hooked, like you say.

I haven't had a chance to really dig into the first few chapters of your book yet, as I have some crazy stuff going on this week, but I can't wait to set aside the time to curl up with the pages in my favorite reading spot. It's really a great honor to be able to edit your book!
Hi Sandy,
It was interesting comparing your review with Alyssa's. You both seem somewhat interested in reading the next book in the series which is a recommendation for the theme development.
I know what you mean about the lack of depth in a character and the clueless female protagonist--I feel the same. And I was intrigued by your description of John--what female reader doesn't like "just the right amount of moody, dark, bad boy sex appeal?"

The ending being a total cliffhanger is also a turn-off for me. I definitely need some satisfying resolution with a hint of something compelling to generate interest in the next book.
1 reply · active 730 weeks ago
Maybe John's bad boy sex appeal will lure you into reading the book after all, despite some of the frustrations I mentioned in my own reading experience. ;)
Bold review to take a stand against the much celebrated Twilight. I like your guts and I think your reviews are really good because your willing to point out flaws instead of just say "OMG...this book is so good!! You must read it!"
1 reply · active 730 weeks ago
Thanks, Mike! I try to be a critical reader, so I can improve my own writing and really enjoy the great parts I find in books. I did complete the entire Twilight series--even though Bella often annoyed me--and enjoyed the books immensely. :)
Kalina Converse's avatar

Kalina Converse · 730 weeks ago

Thanks for being a guest blogger and for your honest opinion on the book! Now I'm torn whether I want to read the book or not. LOL. I will probably still put it on my 'To Read' list. It sounds like it's more plot driven than character driven?
Thanks for putting out such great posts yourself on this wonderful blog, so that I can have the opportunity to be a guest, Kalina! :) Yes, the first book seems to focus a great deal on the setup, like Alyssa mentioned. But I believe Meg Cabot will probably develop the characters much more in the rest of the series. I'm still torn on whether or not to continue the series, but I do think it's worth a read, and quite different from her other stuff.
I lived it!!! Can't wait to read the next one. A little depressed Barnes and Nobles doesn't expect it till next year. :'( if anyone knows when it cones out plz tell

Post a new comment

Comments by